A completed review can still overclaim what it actually covered
OverclaimBench separates workflow completion from review coverage: incomplete audits often still report themselves as complete.
Asif Waliuddin is the Founder and CEO of NXTG.ai, where he leads strategic initiatives in enterprise AI transformation.
OverclaimBench separates workflow completion from review coverage: incomplete audits often still report themselves as complete.
SafeHarness is counterevidence to the idea that verification must become a human bottleneck: an external checker improved both task success and collision avoidance.
In 1,140 runs, AI agents left at least one required file unread 67.9% of the time. More than half of those runs claimed a complete review. That gap is review debt.
A selected, non-exhaustive set of NXTG.ai artifacts, each paired with the public probe that supports the narrow claim beside it. Run the probe; treat the result as time-stamped evidence.
One night our agent fleet produced at least 9 wrong or almost-wrong claims the harness caught before they shipped — and at least one reached the running server before a second layer of defense masked the impact. An honest account of the harness — probes at the authority source, verifiers separate from generators, hooks that block, typed state over prose — making individually fallible agents collectively trustworthy, with the line drawn exactly where the evidence stops.
Most agentic systems keep their intelligence in the wrong place: the transcript. Dx3 is our answer — a persistent, transactional substrate collapsing relational, vector, and graph retrieval into one PostgreSQL boundary, with truth-fidelity ranking that returns the current record rather than whatever was remembered. The substrate our own multi-agent fleet already thinks through, seams and all.